← Search

Christina Drees

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
449 matches · 288W–161L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Drees to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history449 matches
W
2026-06-18 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Grob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Castelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-05-30 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with EMELIA ALLEN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-28 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Castelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · DTC #1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sabine Curtis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-21 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Grob
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kami Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-09 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kiyono
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kami Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kami Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kami Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Lobato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 61.7% of games
3.5
63.1%
171W–100L · 55.5% of games
4.0
52.1%
38W–35L · 52% of games
7.0
80.8%
42W–10L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
164 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
132 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
80 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
21 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
18 matches
#2 Female Doubles
3%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal