← Search

Kami Adamson

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 137W–42L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kami Adamson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-05-16 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-07 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-29 · DTC #1 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lana Penrose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-22 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-16 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-04-09 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-08 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-28 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Drees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
76.1%
121W–38L · 59.1% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.4% of games
7.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams