← Search

Tami Brandon

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
143 matches · 58W–85L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
26 of 73
NV · 3.5
86 of 228

Tami is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tami has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tami has gone from the 33rd to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
45.4%
54W–65L · 49.1% of games
4.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
L
Chelsea Gray / Jamie Kelvington
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.007about as expected — took 42% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Margaret Pettigrew / Kimberly Simons
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.018better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
−0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Jill Morrison / Sheri Cherubino
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.062better than expected — took 86% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-11 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.003about as expected — took 55% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
Paige Song / Rachel Lamb
2026-03-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
−0.029below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.016better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Judith Watson
+0.016better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
Carolyn Wood / Merrilu Kutcher
2026-02-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
−0.030below expectation — took 42% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Festa
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.