Search

Sandie Mainwal-Price

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
329 matches · 216W–113L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.21
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
98 of 139
NV · 3.5
153 of 228

Sandie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sandie has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sandie has gone from the 86th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
63.4%
128W–74L · 54.5% of games
7.0
72.9%
78W–29L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history329 matches
L
Karen Watts / Rika Cookchamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Diane Paull
+0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Paull
0.010better than expected — took 100% of games against 87% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Nancy Stafford / Stacie Corelle
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Spelman
+0.034better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
Britney Jensen / Tracey Lee
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Cortez
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Debra Johnson / Deborah Graham
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Spelman
0.032below expectation — took 65% of games against 71% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Chelsea Gray / Nichole Averett
2026-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Horns
+0.020better than expected — took 42% of games against 36% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Hong Lee / Racquel Toyozaki
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ara Lee Stimson
0.028below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Horns
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
Gina Case / Andra Starr Scano
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arlene Babbitt
0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Mary Lind / Shanna Toft
2026-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arlene Babbitt
+0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Whipple
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Tami Brandon / Judith Watson
2026-02-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Dye
0.016below expectation — took 44% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.