← Search

Racquel Toyozaki

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
181 matches · 92W–89L · seasons 2019–2026
Where Racquel sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Racquel is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Racquel has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.52019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Racquel has gone from the 23rd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.3% of games
3.0
51.9%
28W–26L · 50.1% of games
3.5
45.7%
32W–38L · 48.8% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miriam Pasimio
−0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Sandie Mainwal-Price / Ara Lee Stimson
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hong Lee
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Carla Kuhl / Deborah Graham
2025-12-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miriam Pasimio
−0.029about as expected — took 71% of games against 74% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Kay Patel / Aimee Shank
2025-11-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisela Giordano
+0.004about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Apone
−0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Jill Morrison / Shawn McNulty
2025-10-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisela Giordano
−0.005about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Nancy Holland / Lisa Cook
2025-10-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Mednicoff
−0.018below expectation — took 32% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Michelle Simister / Katie Kerestesi
2025-10-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerri Comings
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-16 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Mednicoff
+0.024better than expected — took 100% of games against 74% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Amy Waters / EMELIA ALLEN
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marisela Giordano
−0.009below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Miriam Pasimio
−0.039below expectation — took 14% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marisela Giordano
−0.035below expectation — took 29% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.