Search

Arlene Babbitt

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
338 matches · 180W–158L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.09
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
14%
down to 3.0
86%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 9% down · 91% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.11. Higher than today’s 3.09 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
126 of 139
NV · 3.5
209 of 228

Arlene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Arlene has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Arlene has gone from the 77th to the 32nd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
49.7%
74W–75L · 50.7% of games
4.0
38.2%
21W–34L · 44.3% of games
7.0
69.9%
79W–34L · 58.1% of games
8.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 31.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history338 matches
L
Kelly Kedge / Nancy Hollandchamps
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Carrie Whipple
0.069below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Kelly McPherson / Terry Powers
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Whipple
0.031below expectation — took 57% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Miller
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Dye
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Nicole Austin / Melanie Isbell
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Alba
0.011below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Joan Perricone / Jennifer Petrie
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Whipple
0.012about as expected — took 46% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Whipple
+0.034better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Marilyn Fenn / Margo Isler
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Dye
0.008about as expected — took 63% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Andrea Dawson / Katrin Dragnev
2026-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Dye
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Gina Case / Andra Starr Scano
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandie Mainwal-Price
0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Samantha Schuster / Amrita Soli
2026-04-22 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Alba
+0.012better than expected — took 54% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kelly McPherson / Suni Chabrow
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carrie Whipple
+0.041better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.