← Search

Travis Azous

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
320 matches · 173W–147L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.44
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 48 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
77%
stay 3.5
23%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.37. Lower than today’s 3.44 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
35 of 139
NV · 3.5
44 of 228

Travis is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Travis has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Travis has gone from the 39th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
55.8%
24W–19L · 55.7% of games
3.5
57.4%
105W–78L · 54.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
30W–40L · 47.9% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history320 matches
W
Jules Mitchell / Lisa Schnitz
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jamie Warrington
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayley Hollander
−0.025below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Kathleen Chamberlain
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Loc Nguyen / Megan Bellchamps
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with Shanna Toft
+0.001about as expected — took 42% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Chelsea Gray / Jamie Kelvingtonchamps
2026-06-15 · #2 Doubles · with Kathleen Chamberlain
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
+0.016better than expected — took 100% of games against 77% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Crystal LaTour / Gina Case
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Zack
−0.023below expectation — took 60% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Chamberlain
−0.012about as expected — took 56% of games against 60% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Kwong-Blais
−0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie MacDonald
−0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Nicole Medas / Christi Lin
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannan Ohlson
−0.001about as expected — took 61% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kristen Radlosky / Katie Kerestesi
2026-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patti Zack
−0.028about as expected — took 71% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.