← Search

Valerie Valow-Orris

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
347 matches · 138W–209L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 26 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
74%
stay 3.0
26%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 94% stay · 6% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
9 of 22
NV · 3.0
72 of 166

Valerie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Valerie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Valerie has gone from the 34th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
48.2%
27W–29L · 49.2% of games
3.5
25.3%
41W–121L · 39.6% of games
6.0
72.3%
34W–13L · 58.8% of games
7.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 49.6% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history347 matches
W
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
−0.028below expectation — took 53% of games against 64% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michelle Simister / Jennifer Blais
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
−0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Ray
+0.032better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Lisa Cook / Nancy Holland
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Patel
+0.021better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Lori LaBarbera / Teisha Hunsaker
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bambi Montag
+0.015about as expected — took 33% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
−0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-05-06 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliann Schnabel
+0.035better than expected — took 100% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Golssa Moridi / Elizabeth Pierce
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Kochanski
+0.041better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Sirina Shouldis / Meryll Ledesma
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Morley
−0.042below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Frazier
+0.012about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Mary Anne van Liere / Deborah O'Connor
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Frazier
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Liz MacDonald / Christine LaBarre
2026-04-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
+0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.