← Search

Valerie Valow-Orris

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
347 matches · 138W–209L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Valerie Valow-Orris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history347 matches
W
2026-06-06 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Loretta Moses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-20 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bambi Montag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-07 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-05-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliann Schnabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-05 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Kochanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sally Morley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Irene Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Gamberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
48.2%
27W–29L · 49.2% of games
3.5
25.3%
41W–121L · 39.6% of games
6.0
72.3%
34W–13L · 58.8% of games
7.0
46.5%
20W–23L · 49.6% of games
6.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 30.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
121 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
44 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal