← Search

Tiffany Rorman

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 39W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Rorman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-08-12 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Lily Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Tamaris Cotta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-27 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Cheryl Cooley / Lani Wong
2026-07-22 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Lily Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-13 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenda Nayef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Sharon Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mayela Moneo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sharon Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sharon Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-25 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-22 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amy Meyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-11 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mayela Moneo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 54.4% of games
3.0
20.8%
16W–61L · 37% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#3 Female Doubles
11%
13 matches
#2 Female Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe