← Search

Blythe Mancini

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
114 matches · 39W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
19%
stay 2.5
81%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 64% stay · 36% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.47. Lower than today’s 2.57 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 2.5
15 of 30
NV · 2.5
16 of 33

Blythe is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Blythe has been 2.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Blythe has gone from the 13th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
2.5
38.1%
37W–60L · 45.7% of games
3.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
W
Arlene Joyner-Tucker / Chrishena Stanley
2026-07-29 · #1 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Rysha Sierra
+0.031better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Nicole Solovey / Melissa Mcaninch
2026-07-15 · #2 Female Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauryn Moore
+0.070better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Glynis Harris / Janel Mcdonald
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Paula Aquinde
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Kelli Caderot / Gabrielle Vidmar
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lani Wong
−0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Jill Dale / Liz Mcgrath
2026-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Cooley
−0.003about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Tiffany Rorman / Amy Meyer
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lani Wong
+0.031better than expected — took 43% of games against 33% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Danielle Pokroy / Emily Alexander
2026-04-15 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kristina Runion
−0.037below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Kenda Nayef / Julia Choi
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Waite
−0.012about as expected — took 48% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Elis Desiree Peetsalu / Cecilia Reynolds
2026-03-11 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kaleen Jarman
−0.070below expectation — took 20% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Jill Dale / Sachie Mcqueen
2026-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kaleen Jarman
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Janelle Wright / Amber Pasco
2026-02-25 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kimberly Cooks
−0.014below expectation — took 46% of games against 52% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Janelle Wright / Amber Pasco
2026-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cheryl Cooley
−0.017below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.