← Search

Victoria Nienhuis

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
203 matches · 119W–84L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.25
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.5
40 of 73
NV · 3.5
132 of 228

Victoria is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Victoria has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202220242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Victoria has gone from the 69th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
65.4%
68W–36L · 56.8% of games
4.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 40.6% of games
7.0
64.2%
34W–19L · 56.3% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 36.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history203 matches
W
Joan Chevalier / Patricia Delgado
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorry Mazzara
+0.008better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Cynthia Turner / Denise Goshorn
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Davis
+0.041better than expected — took 32% of games against 23% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Nancy Holland / Rika Cook
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
+0.037better than expected — took 29% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bambi Montag
−0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Valerie Valow-Orris
−0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
−0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Debbie Torbati / Joni Gurrola
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Davis
+0.027better than expected — took 37% of games against 31% expected
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Crawford
−0.007about as expected — took 46% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindi Ray
−0.068below expectation — took 14% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Tina Shirey / Kimberly Simons
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindi Ray
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Megan Bender / Merrilu Kutcher
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Kerby
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Sabine Curtis / Nancy Holland
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindi Ray
−0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.