← Search

Brenda Rowles

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
268 matches · 106W–162L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
21 of 22
NV · 3.0
146 of 166

Brenda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brenda has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Brenda has gone from the 54th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–6L · 31.5% of games
3.5
42.4%
78W–106L · 47.2% of games
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 35.9% of games
7.0
43.5%
27W–35L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history268 matches
L
Jeannie Collins / Ada Vera
2026-07-27 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Jacobs
−0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Yesenia Arias / Anjelica Moore
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Burr
−0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Courtney Long / Maria Dellett
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Shiklanian
+0.009about as expected — took 42% of games against 39% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Nancy Holland / Rika Cook
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
+0.037better than expected — took 29% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Casey Primmer
2026-05-13 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliann Schnabel
−0.018below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jessica Marx / Jocelyn Herman
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Shiklanian
−0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Amber Pasco / Dylan Underwood
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Walford
−0.056below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliann Schnabel
−0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliann Schnabel
−0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Renee Blango-Michie / Diane Schopp
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindi Ray
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Arlene Babbitt / Pam Kirkendall
2026-02-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Crawford
−0.005below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.