← Search

Brenda Rowles

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 107W–163L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brenda Rowles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-08-10 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Brianne Pepperman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-03 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Beine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Burr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Shiklanian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-16 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-14 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victoria Nienhuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · DRAGONRIDGE CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juliann Schnabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Shiklanian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Walford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-12 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliann Schnabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliann Schnabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.9% of games
3.5
42.4%
78W–106L · 47.2% of games
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 35.9% of games
7.0
43.5%
27W–35L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
73 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
29 matches
#3 Female Doubles
3%
9 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal