← Search

Kara Gaston

LAS VEGAS, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
194 matches · 103W–91L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
25%
stay 3.0
75%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 70% stay · 30% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.05 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.0
46 of 166

Kara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kara has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Kara has gone from the 4th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
60%
18W–12L · 53.3% of games
3.0
58.9%
33W–23L · 54.6% of games
3.5
30%
12W–28L · 43.3% of games
5.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.3% of games
6.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.8% of games
6.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.9% of games
7.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history194 matches
W
Raj Singh / Linda Guastellamixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyler Gaston
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Alexander Klupchak / Lisa Rossmixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tyler Gaston
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Olga Bencini / Maryna Postchamps
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Shi L Oskooi
−0.041below expectation — took 42% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Genesis Garcia / Jocelyn Hermanchamps
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Christine LaBarre
−0.034below expectation — took 53% of games against 65% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Anne Kellogg
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Lori LaBarbera / Jamie Kelvington
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Schnitz
+0.005about as expected — took 29% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Shellene Goudge / Mercedes Renteria IVmixed
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Gaston
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Schnitz
−0.005about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tyler Gaston
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Meekyoung Lee / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine LaBarre
+0.022better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Renee Johnson / Tamaris Cotta
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine LaBarre
+0.040better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.