Search

Shaza Nayef

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
289 matches · 128W–161L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.04
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 34 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
32%
stay 3.0
68%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 75% stay · 25% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.95. Lower than today’s 3.04 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
39 of 134
NV · 3.0
50 of 166

Shaza is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Shaza has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Shaza has gone from the 16th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
51.5%
35W–33L · 51.1% of games
3.0
41.3%
69W–98L · 47.9% of games
3.5
35%
7W–13L · 45.2% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 31% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history289 matches
W
Stacy Burr / Brianne Pepperman
2026-07-22 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Priscilla Gaughan / Amy Arbeli
2026-07-18 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Arcella
+0.043better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Rhianna Schwartz / Brenda Cambridge
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Richas
0.021below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Asad Nawaz / Shawanna Johnsonmixed
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wael Eid
+0.000below expectation — took 42% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Rowles
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Christina Smith / Melissa Blacker
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsi Grady
0.014below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Christina Smith / Amy Arbeli
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arlene Lytle
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Shani Ma / Walter Sonntagmixed
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wael Eid
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 36% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Gina Rivera
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Kellye Ray / Carolina Nigro
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniella Toms
+0.021better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Amber Pasco / Dylan Underwood
2026-04-14 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Badain
+0.012better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Megan Bender / Tenli Flourens
2026-04-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.