Search

Arlene Lytle

Las Vegas, NV
3.0A year-end 2025
186 matches · 70W–116L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 2.5
93%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
130 of 134
NV · 3.0
162 of 166

Arlene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Arlene has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Arlene has gone from the 11th to the 9th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
2.5
41.8%
28W–39L · 46.2% of games
3.0
35.3%
42W–77L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history186 matches
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Addy Iveth Zilberman
+0.003below expectation — took 14% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Christina Smith / Amy Arbeli
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
+0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Han Hu / Margo Isler
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
0.009below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Kellye Ray / Carolina Nigro
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Addy Iveth Zilberman
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniella Toms
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Shauna Walch / Connie Vento
2026-03-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Addy Iveth Zilberman
0.042below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Chelsie Hawkinson / Elizabeth Templeton
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniella Toms
+0.037better than expected — took 67% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Eshragh / Geraldine Wright
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
+0.052better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Trish Metriyakool / Roxanne Shoen
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniella Toms
+0.051better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Christa Wirges / Stephanie Haber
2026-02-10 · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sandra Walford
0.026below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.019below expectation — took 0% of games against 10% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Nancy Ozun / Kelly Perkins
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Wills
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.