← Search

Trish Metriyakool

Las Vegas, NV
2.5C year-end 2025
217 matches · 98W–119L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.57
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
19%
stay 2.5
81%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 64% stay · 36% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.47. Lower than today’s 2.57 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 2.5
16 of 30
NV · 2.5
17 of 33

Trish is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Trish has been 2.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Trish has gone from the 27th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
51%
77W–74L · 50.5% of games
3.0
33.3%
21W–42L · 43% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history217 matches
W
Rafaella Reynolds / Karissa Oda
2026-07-20 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Elise Mizrachi
+0.078better than expected — took 72% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Talia Elma / Scarlett Cavalli
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lenny Grigorian
+0.013better than expected — took 60% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Kreston
+0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 23% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Glynis Harris / Cayla Mccaughan
2026-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Nicole Solovey
−0.051below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Megan Johnson / Kristen Donadio
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kaleen Jarman
+0.106better than expected — took 86% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Monica Taylor / Elizabeth Abatangelo
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Malos
+0.040better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Carrie Maddux / Therese Laudenslagerchamps
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Hartzell
+0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxanne Shoen
−0.051below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Geraldine Wright / Elizabeth Eshragh
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Hartzell
+0.022better than expected — took 41% of games against 35% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Lindsey Jacobs / Sandra Walford
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Birnbaum
−0.025below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-12-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meghan Arnold
−0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Eryn Weed / Cecilia Reynolds
2025-12-10 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Eva Liang
−0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.