← Search

Moon-Hui Choi

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
357 matches · 134W–223L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.92
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
83%
stay 3.0
17%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.86. Lower than today’s 2.92 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
62 of 134
NV · 3.0
79 of 166

Moon-Hui is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Moon-Hui has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Moon-Hui has gone from the 7th to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
56.4%
22W–17L · 52.5% of games
3.0
32.2%
74W–156L · 42.1% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.4% of games
6.0
46.7%
21W–24L · 48.2% of games
7.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 30.4% of games
5.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67.4% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history357 matches
L
Kellye Ray / Elizabeth Pierce
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Beth Zamani
−0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Christine LaBarre
+0.058better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Brittany Carlson / Renee Johnsonchamps
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · with Emmy Perez
−0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Kimberly Lippisch / Julie Smith
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine LaBarre
+0.068better than expected — took 65% of games against 36% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Pierce / Carine Tsveniashvili
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Knotts
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Mieko Kitamura / Deborah O'Connor
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Helen McDaniel
−0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jack Stevens
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Margaret Pettigrew / Tonia Fike
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jihee Anh
−0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jennifer Blais / Xin Wei
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Wooldridge
−0.073below expectation — took 14% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Kathryn Sloustcher / Brooke Corbett
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nanhee Komoto
+0.043better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Sandra Shearer / Angela Roylance
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emmy Perez
+0.021better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nanhee Komoto
+0.045better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.