Search

Aida Shirley

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
267 matches · 116W–151L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
10%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
78 of 134
NV · 3.0
97 of 166

Aida is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Aida has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202020212022202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Aida has gone from the 31st to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
47.8%
87W–95L · 48.3% of games
3.5
31.9%
15W–32L · 38.1% of games
6.0
50%
4W–4L · 49.3% of games
7.0
33.3%
10W–20L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history267 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-20 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
+0.117better than expected — took 100% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Rochelle Hamatian
2026-07-09 · #1 Female Singles · 3.0
+0.002about as expected — took 54% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Courtney Beine
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.035below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jessica Borghoff / Jeannie Collins
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Perkins
+0.018about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Nicole Horton
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-04-18 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.069better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Tonya Guidi
2026-03-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Margaret Hicks / Deborah O'Connor
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patricia Braganza
0.027below expectation — took 41% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Michelle Mortensen / Janelle Wells
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Templeton
0.006below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Christa Shiklanian / Margaret Bruno
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roslyn Katz
+0.016better than expected — took 53% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.