Search

Civia McCaffrey

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
60 matches · 28W–32L · seasons 20192026
Where Civia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Civia is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Civia has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Civia has gone from the 15th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.0
48.3%
28W–30L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Rochelle Hamatian / Michelle Inman
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Stowe
0.007about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Margaret Bruno / Shaza Nayef
2025-11-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Wilson
0.033below expectation — took 37% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Sonja Rogers / Jaqueline Schultz
2025-11-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Delozier
0.046below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Cerisse Ward / Milena Hadzhieva
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Shah
0.026below expectation — took 55% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Jeannie Collins / Tori Walker
2025-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Delozier
0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Stacy Sheeley Reyes / Rosemarie Caspary
2025-09-15 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Pena
+0.004about as expected — took 53% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Megan Johnson / Maggie Pacholuk
2025-08-11 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Shah
+0.031better than expected — took 48% of games against 36% expected
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
Leah Martin / Lily Ward
2025-08-04 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Wilson
0.021better than expected — took 92% of games against 86% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2025-07-28 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Pena
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Megan Johnson / Lexi Fleury
2025-07-07 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Kluger
+0.067better than expected — took 75% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Delozier
0.049below expectation — took 45% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.