Search

Maria Dellett

Henderson, NV
3.0A year-end 2025
86 matches · 32W–54L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
14 of 22
NV · 3.0
119 of 166

Maria is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Maria has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Maria has gone from the 14th to the 36th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
37.8%
28W–46L · 47.1% of games
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history86 matches
L
Dan Michalski / Julie Brownmixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Harrison Fried
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Lisa Jones / Ashley Richas
2026-07-22 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Joni Kerby
0.031below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · #3 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Maryam Kaveh
+0.105better than expected — took 92% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Maureen Kelly / Charlotte Durisseau
2026-07-13 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Golssa Moridi
+0.017better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Yong Mi DeMilliano / Hee Park
2026-07-06 · #2 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Long
0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Long
0.009about as expected — took 58% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Danika Johnson / Jocelyn Herman
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carine Tsveniashvili
0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Lisa Williams / Ningyi Zheng
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Golssa Moridi
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Golssa Moridi
+0.072better than expected — took 75% of games against 40% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Margaret Bruno / Danielle Britten
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Desiree Mcivor
0.011below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Johnny Underwood / Margaret Pettigrewmixed
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Neary
+0.000about as expected — took 38% of games against 35% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Tina Nathalia / Brittany Carlson
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Desiree Mcivor
0.005about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.