Search

Danielle Britten

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
123 matches · 55W–68L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
86%
stay 3.0
14%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.85. Lower than today’s 2.91 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
67 of 134
NV · 3.0
86 of 166

Danielle is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Danielle has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Danielle has gone from the 26th to the 46th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
47.6%
20W–22L · 48.8% of games
3.0
43.6%
34W–44L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Kellie Woods / Emmy Perez
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wael Eid
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Kelley Candito / Kelle Carlson
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.001better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Nancy Ozun / Amanda Waby
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Brenda Cambridge / Rhianna Schwartz
2026-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammie Meng
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Therese Laudenslager / Carrie Maddux
2026-04-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Richas
0.004about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Asad Nawaz / Karen Hommixed
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wael Eid
+0.000better than expected — took 55% of games against 46% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Maria Dellett / Desiree Mcivor
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.011better than expected — took 63% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
+0.035better than expected — took 43% of games against 32% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Brianne Pepperman / Stacy Burr
2026-03-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsi Grady
0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.