← Search

Brenda Cambridge

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 43W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Brenda Cambridge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-09-08 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhianna Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-3
W
2026-08-11 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arika Carrier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhianna Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-29 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · TPC #1 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhianna Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kinsey Wolanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhianna Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhianna Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-28 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhianna Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
80.4%
41W–10L · 61.4% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal