Teams

SPANISH TRAIL

2026 NTA ADULT FALL LEAGUE · 3.0 WOMEN

15 players · average NTRP 2.77 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
2.77
Holly Crosby
published
2.76
Jenny Mulopulos
published 3
2.72
Sirina Shouldis
published 3
2.59
Aida Shirley
published 3
2.58
Danielle Pokroy
published 2.5
2.56
Nancy Ozun
published 3
2.45
2.44
Roslyn Katz
published 2.5
2.38
Winna Pham
published 2.5
2.30
Stacy Sheeley Reyes
published 2.5
2.20
Sarah Bolor
published
Nina Rossi
published
Tracey Allan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aida Shirley + Chelsie Hawkinson6353% games+7.4% vs expected
Jenny Mulopulos + Holly Crosby13860% games+5.5% vs expected
Nancy Ozun + Stacy Sheeley Reyes8558% games+4.8% vs expected
Nancy Ozun + Roslyn Katz10657% games+4.7% vs expected
Stacy Sheeley Reyes + Roslyn Katz3257% games+2.5% vs expected
Nina Rossi + Jenny Mulopulos8359% games+1.1% vs expected
Chelsie Hawkinson + Holly Crosby6254% games−0.6% vs expected
Jenny Mulopulos + Stacy Sheeley Reyes2541% games−7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chelsie Hawkinson
34W–25L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Holly Crosby
45W–49L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Jenny Mulopulos
136W–132L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Elisabeth Skinner
47W–106L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Sirina Shouldis
110W–75L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Aida Shirley
131W–161L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
2.5
Danielle Pokroy
32W–37L career · no lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
3
Nancy Ozun
109W–137L career · type A · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Kimberly Meechudhone
13W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Roslyn Katz
68W–113L career · no lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
2.5
Winna Pham
11W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
2.5
Stacy Sheeley Reyes
142W–219L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Sarah Bolor
13W–43L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Nina Rossi
49W–44L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracey Allan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.