Search

Daniella Toms

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
187 matches · 89W–98L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
90%
stay 3.0
10%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
79 of 134
NV · 3.0
98 of 166

Daniella is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Daniella has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Daniella has gone from the 10th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
44.6%
25W–31L · 49% of games
3.0
49.1%
56W–58L · 50.1% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.050better than expected — took 86% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Ani Zargaryan
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.073below expectation — took 0% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Danielle Caswell / Meghan Arnold
2026-05-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Richas
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Dorothy Urban / Deborah Graham
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Crystal Ziebarth
0.011about as expected — took 54% of games against 59% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Nathaniel Bybee / Yarisbel Schieckmixed
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with George Baggott
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kelly Twells / Sandra Shearer
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Badain
0.008about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kellye Ray / Carolina Nigro
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaza Nayef
+0.021better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Kimberly Lippisch
2026-04-19 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
ANN MARIE WEAVER / Casey Primmer
2026-04-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
0.034below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Kimberly Yang / Kinsey Wolanski
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christa Shiklanian
0.024below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-04-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arlene Lytle
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Leslie Brodie / Katie Kerestesi
2026-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Richas
0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.