Search

George Baggott

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
83 matches · 54W–29L · seasons 20242026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.98
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
58%
stay 3.0
42%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.98 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Henderson · 3.0
11 of 29
NV · 3.0
77 of 193

George is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

George has been a steady 3.0 across all 3 seasons on record.

2.53.0202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, George has gone from the 68th to the 44th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 54.4% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history83 matches
W
Jonathan Fish / Mitchell Pohlman
2026-07-16 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Badain
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Jim Roulias / Chris Rasmussen
2026-07-09 · #2 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Farris
+0.060better than expected — took 75% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Raimund Liberato / Nabil Nassri
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Weaver
+0.052better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Michael Urban / Samuel Mujica Trenche
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Hulse
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Leticia Schoff / Norman Wumixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Eshragh
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Billy Ching / Thedio Rogolofoi
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Roehm
0.084below expectation — took 8% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Mike Baraiolo / VILL GUDEN
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Foreman
0.017below expectation — took 48% of games against 54% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Nathaniel Bybee / Yarisbel Schieckmixed
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniella Toms
+0.000below expectation — took 0% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Thomas Waite / Getnet Fikre
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Hulse
+0.011about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kimberly Lippisch / Darrell Luzzomixed
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Brown
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Zhao Lang / Jerry Prodoehl
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Hulse
+0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Michael Savage / Dominic Guzzetti
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Roehm
0.016below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.