← Search

George Baggott

Henderson, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 54W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add George Baggott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-07-16 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Badain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Hulse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-10 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Eshragh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Roehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bradley Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniella Toms mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Hulse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Terry Hulse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-28 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Roehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 54.4% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
6.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 55.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#2 Male Doubles
4%
3 matches
#3 Male Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams