Search

Mike Baraiolo

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
116 matches · 53W–63L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
23%
stay 3.0
77%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 69% stay · 31% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
34 of 134
NV · 3.0
43 of 166

Mike is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mike has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mike has gone from the 30th to the 55th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
45.7%
32W–38L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
48.7%
19W–20L · 48.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
W
Derek Clotfelter / Allyssandra Prodoehlmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shawn McNulty
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Darrell Luzzo / Rafael Delgado
2026-07-07 · #2 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Bernard Osullivan
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.040better than expected — took 62% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 2-4
W
Riz Articulo
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.031better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Desiree Kathmann / Kellen Cornettchamps
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Amy Nhaisi
+0.016about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Talia Galvez / Neil Covingtonmixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Brown
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Nhaisi
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
George Baggott / Bradley Foreman
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with VILL GUDEN
+0.027better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Margaret Bruno / Aleksei Zilbermanmixed
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Nhaisi
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Brandynn Elwart / Priscilla Gaughanmixed
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeannie Collins
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Kelly Elwart / Brandynn Elwartmixed
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Nhaisi
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Lance Allgower / Kristin Stowemixed
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Brown
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.