Search

Mitchell Pohlman

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
60 matches · 38W–22L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
3%
stay 3.0
97%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 33% stay · 67% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.03. Lower than today’s 3.16 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
17 of 154
NV · 3.0
21 of 193

Mitchell is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mitchell has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mitchell has gone from the 58th to the 78th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
81.8%
18W–4L · 59.7% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.2% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 73.8% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
L
George Baggott / Marc Badain
2026-07-16 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Fish
0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Josh Haldeman / Gianni Del Vecchio
2026-07-10 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Dali
+0.042better than expected — took 42% of games against 33% expected
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Marilyn Fenn / Luke Nhaisichamps
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Tharika Irvin
+0.031better than expected — took 100% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tharika Irvin
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Carter Kessler / Valerie Witherspoonmixed
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tharika Irvin
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Melissa Hicks / Joseph DeMillianomixed
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tharika Irvin
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Lisa Ross / Michael Dalimixed
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzette LaGrange-Miranda
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Paul Scott / Thomas Standish
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Holmes
+0.059better than expected — took 92% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tharika Irvin
+0.000about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Hopson
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jordan Raub
+0.035better than expected — took 86% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tharika Irvin
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.