Search

Jared Overholtzer

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
103 matches · 52W–51L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
89%
stay 3.0
11%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.84. Lower than today’s 2.90 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
84 of 154
NV · 3.0
108 of 193

Jared is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jared has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jared has gone from the 15th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
49.5%
45W–46L · 53% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 52.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history103 matches
L
Zhao Lang / Kirk Moll
2026-07-28 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Maurice Silva
0.080below expectation — took 29% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Dale Haines / Keith Kirby
2026-07-21 · #3 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Waite
0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Gil Ophir / Joseph Weidhaas
2026-07-07 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel Pursel
0.021about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Robert E Kinsey / Joseph Engle
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanje Sedera
0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Chris Marlin / Ralph Beck
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brent Silva
+0.007better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
Luis Barragan / Ruben Ramos
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with George Ralls
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Andrew Meyers / Pat Flynn
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Johnny Underwood
0.048below expectation — took 41% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Mark Joseph Apostol / Hunter Holmes
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malvin Lugo
0.048below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Getnet Fikre
0.023below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
James Campbell / Carlos Gracia
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Corey Zimet
+0.081better than expected — took 100% of games against 55% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Brian Brancato / Jonathan Fish
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Rohn
+0.021better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
Robert Erisch / Marc Saggese
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Rohn
+0.053better than expected — took 86% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.