Search

Sanje Sedera

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
170 matches · 85W–85L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 28% stay · 72% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.05. Lower than today’s 3.17 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
13 of 134
NV · 3.0
17 of 166

Sanje is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sanje has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sanje has gone from the 26th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
63.6%
56W–32L · 56.2% of games
3.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 40% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
8W–8L · 47.5% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46% of games
6.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 38.9% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history170 matches
W
Keith Kirby / Robert Erisch
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malvin Lugo
+0.000about as expected — took 68% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Jose Avila / Jim SOUZA
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Rosenthal
+0.014better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Robert E Kinsey / Joseph Engle
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jared Overholtzer
0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michele Behnen
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Kent Watts / Thomas Standish
2026-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Rosenthal
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Allison Ibarguen / Jon Ibarguenmixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Kirk Stewart / Dominic Guzzetti
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Rohn
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Michael Villani / Scot Martin
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edgar Rizarri
+0.025better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Steve Horton / Dan Hale
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Mulopulos
+0.032better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristyl Addison
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Robert Bravin / Cary Carter
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Dali
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Kent Watts / Michael Gifford
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jose Despujos Cardillo
+0.038better than expected — took 58% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 5-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.