← Search

Julie Schoolmeester

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 75W–90L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Julie Schoolmeester to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-07-27 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-13 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Paola Docter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
Maureen Kelly / Amy Bernstein
2026-07-07 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Jolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-09 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · DESERT PALM · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Tarantan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-26 · DESERT PALM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanje Sedera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Row
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · DESERT PALM · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hope Nulf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.2%
58W–49L · 51.1% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 37% of games
6.0mixed
35.3%
12W–22L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
40 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
12 matches
#3 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe