← Search

Julie Schoolmeester

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
165 matches · 75W–90L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
68%
stay 3.0
32%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
55 of 134
NV · 3.0
69 of 166

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been 3.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 23rd to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
55.8%
58W–46L · 51.6% of games
3.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 37% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
35.3%
12W–22L · 42.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history165 matches
L
Kelly Schwalbe / Yong Mi DeMilliano
2026-07-27 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrienne Berman
−0.034below expectation — took 38% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Kelly Perkins / Philippa Bernstein
2026-07-13 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Paola Docter
−0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Maureen Kelly / Amy Bernstein
2026-07-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Jolly
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Jeannie Collins / Tori Walker
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
+0.046better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maureen Caruso
+0.055better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Veazey
−0.053below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Rochelle Hamatian
2026-05-09 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.021better than expected — took 72% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Margaret Bruno / Chris Marlinmixed
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Tarantan
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Allison Ibarguen / Jon Ibarguenmixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanje Sedera
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Stacy Burr / Tonya Guidi
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Row
+0.011better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Sean Ono / Linda Onomixed
2026-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Hope Nulf
+0.000about as expected — took 42% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Maggie Pacholuk
2026-03-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.