← Search

Mark Tarantan

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
220 matches · 108W–112L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.99
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
53%
stay 3.0
47%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 86% stay · 14% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.91. Lower than today’s 2.99 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
49 of 134
NV · 3.0
62 of 166

Mark is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mark has been a steady 3.0 across all 7 seasons on record.

2.53.02020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mark has gone from the 24th to the 63rd percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
60.4%
55W–36L · 55.8% of games
3.5
36.4%
16W–28L · 46.2% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.4% of games
5.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.8% of games
6.0mixed
45.9%
17W–20L · 52.8% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 58.5% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history220 matches
W
Margaret Bruno / Chris Marlinmixed
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Julie Schoolmeester
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Brandon Myers
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Brandynn Elwart / Priscilla Gaughanmixed
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Pettigrew
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Jordan Castro
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Jackson Johnson
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.076below expectation — took 33% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Victor Pluto / Stacey Smithmixed
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristyl Addison
+0.000better than expected — took 100% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Kelley Ferrence / Dan Michalskimixed
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ross
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Nathaniel Bybee / Yarisbel Schieckmixed
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margaret Pettigrew
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Erik Burn / Kristyl Addisonmixed
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ross
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Nicole Medas / John Shookmixed
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carla Eggleston
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
NANCIE WEBSTER / Darren Rouvimixed
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristyl Addison
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Kelly McPherson / Tomas Reyes Castellanosmixed
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marijo Peterson
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.