Search

Nicole Medas

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
340 matches · 117W–223L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 39 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
103 of 139
NV · 3.5
163 of 228

Nicole is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nicole has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Nicole has gone from the 22nd to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
41.4%
67W–95L · 44.9% of games
4.0
23%
17W–57L · 38.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
29.2%
19W–46L · 44.8% of games
7.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 46% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history340 matches
L
Loc Nguyen / Nicole Reyes
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Krzyzaniak
+0.040better than expected — took 33% of games against 25% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Blake Kelly / Michaela Stevensmixed
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Cronin
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christi Lin
0.021below expectation — took 35% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Mari Valvo / Joseph Gongmixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patrick Cronin
+0.000about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Serena Roberts / Carli Fettig
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shellene Goudge
+0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Tanya Hale / Karen Watts
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Kattau
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christi Lin
+0.001about as expected — took 39% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Dan Michalski / Julie Brownmixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Shook
+0.000better than expected — took 57% of games against 45% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vinne Chen
0.006below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Klupchak
+0.000better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Erik Burn / Karen Hommixed
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Klupchak
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carla Eggleston
+0.003below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.