← Search

Natasha Kattau

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
320 matches · 184W–136L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
7%
stay 3.0
93%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 48% stay · 52% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.12 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.0
20 of 134
NV · 3.0
26 of 166

Natasha is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Natasha has played at 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.02.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Natasha has gone from the 54th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
2.5
68.2%
30W–14L · 61% of games
3.0
62.4%
63W–38L · 56.9% of games
3.5
40.7%
22W–32L · 48.2% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.8% of games
5.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 69.6% of games
6.0mixed
56.4%
22W–17L · 52.9% of games
6.5mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
11W–11L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history320 matches
L
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Lukasiak
−0.019below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Brinlee
−0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Drew Saldana / Nicole Nestmanmixed
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with STEPHANE BIRY
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
James Shaffer / Emily McRadychamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Chris Stimson
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Jeff Thompson / Liz Givenchamps
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Daigo Ishikawa
−0.028below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Francine Mazza / Michael Borensteinchamps
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · with Daigo Ishikawa
−0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 58% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Tanya Hale / Karen Watts
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Medas
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Claudia Hernandez / Diane Paull
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Sager
+0.021better than expected — took 56% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Alex Schrack / Allan-Robert Peetsalumixed
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daigo Ishikawa
+0.000about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
Andrea Dawson / Christina Rich
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisia Pulella
+0.028better than expected — took 44% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Valeria Perdomo / Diane Paull
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisia Pulella
−0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Kara Gaston / Tyler Gastonmixed
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daigo Ishikawa
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.