← Search

Chris Stimson

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
282 matches · 149W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.80
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
1%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
33 of 129
NV · 4.0
47 of 203

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chris has gone from the 58th to the 73rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
60.5%
52W–34L · 53.9% of games
4.5
36.2%
25W–44L · 44.4% of games
7.0
50%
13W–13L · 50.5% of games
8.0
73.1%
19W–7L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 60.3% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
52%
13W–12L · 49.8% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history282 matches
W
James Shaffer / Emily McRadychamps
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Natasha Kattau
+0.016better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Peyman Bastani / Ben Ho
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
−0.024below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Ishmael Gibson / Nathan Rose
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Sylvain
+0.048better than expected — took 41% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Robert Roig / Johnny Underwood
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernard Osullivan
−0.054below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yarisbel Schieck
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karl Robinson
−0.019below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Reynaldo Braganza / KEITH JUNG
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernard Osullivan
+0.016better than expected — took 67% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jackson Olsen / Jason Glick
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason MacDonald
+0.034better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Pursel
+0.028better than expected — took 53% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
Brian Carroll / Melissa Hicksmixed
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yarisbel Schieck
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Paul Hollander / David Kartzinel
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cody Kennedy
+0.010about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
David Holmes / Randy Cox
2026-03-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason MacDonald
+0.066better than expected — took 80% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.