← Search

Ren Lopez

Boulder City, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
209 matches · 130W–79L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
86%
stay 3.5
14%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.5
52 of 228

Ren is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ren has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Ren has gone from the 22nd to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
70.9%
83W–34L · 55.5% of games
4.0
48.5%
33W–35L · 48.6% of games
4.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.9% of games
6.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history209 matches
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Wylie
−0.009about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Miguel Calvillo / Maggie Pacholukmixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Nathalia
+0.000about as expected — took 54% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Ivan Farris / Isaac Martin
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Mcclary
−0.006about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.015below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kellen Cornett
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.030better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Alan Mcgrath
2026-05-02 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Harrison Fried
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.050better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Gianni Del Vecchio
2026-04-18 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.004about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Adam Austin
2026-04-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.012about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Alan Mcgrathchamps
2026-04-10 · #1 Singles
+0.011about as expected — took 33% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-08 · #2 Doubles · with David Leibner
−0.063below expectation — took 29% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.