Search

David Leibner

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
129 matches · 85W–44L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.53
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 29 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
34%
stay 3.5
66%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 76% stay · 24% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.44. Lower than today’s 3.53 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
14 of 139
NV · 3.5
14 of 228

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, David has gone from the 61st to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.4%
34W–18L · 56.3% of games
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 52.1% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 50.8% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 60% of games
7.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
L
Brian Wylie / Ren Lopez
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Earl Peralta
+0.009about as expected — took 43% of games against 40% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Bill Bosnos / Dan Michalski
2026-07-28 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Strobelt
+0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
LaCheyva Edmonis / Biko D'abreaumixed
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Graybeal
+0.000below expectation — took 71% of games against 80% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Brandynn Elwart / Kelly Elwartmixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Graybeal
+0.000about as expected — took 61% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Earl Peralta
0.022below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Christopher Madsen / Jeremy Madsen
2026-07-14 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Earl Peralta
+0.017better than expected — took 50% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Adam Austin / Michael Webb
2026-07-12 · #3 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Ivan Farris
0.026below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Christi Lin / Robert Warkmixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Graybeal
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Earl Peralta
+0.015better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Richard van Diepen
0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jackson Olsen / Allen Fleegle
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Ho
+0.027better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Erik Burn / Danny Siciliano
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Ho
0.001about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.