← Search

Enhua Chen

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
283 matches · 208W–75L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
66%
stay 3.5
34%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 91% stay · 9% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.39. Lower than today’s 3.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
23 of 139
NV · 3.5
29 of 228

Enhua is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Enhua has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 2 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Enhua has gone from the 83rd to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
89.7%
26W–3L · 70.8% of games
3.5
78.5%
62W–17L · 59.8% of games
4.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 48.9% of games
5.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 90.9% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 61.2% of games
6.5mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
72.5%
29W–11L · 58.6% of games
7.5mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 60.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history283 matches
W
Carlos Aguirre / Chantel Vumixed
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Chen
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Chen
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Christopher Silversmith / Elijah Dunhamchamps
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Tam Vu
+0.016better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Patrick Phero / Christopher Tranchamps
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with Wade Richardson
−0.056below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
David Schlatter / Chris Marlin
2026-06-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy James
+0.035better than expected — took 92% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Geoffrey Thompson / Tony Cimber
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Haas
−0.010about as expected — took 54% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Kara Godfrey
+0.032better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Sean Amberg / Nicole Reyeschamps
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · with Kara Godfrey
+0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kara Godfrey
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Brennan Price / Tracey Cutlermixed
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kara Godfrey
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
James Mcclary / Miguel Calvillo
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Qing Guo
+0.040better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Shellene Goudge / Tam Vumixed
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yan Uyeno
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.