← Search

Sean Amberg

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 184W–86L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sean Amberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
W
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Seda Sargsyan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Mike Kirby / Zel Mertz
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Reyes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Sarah Bach / Josh Stimac
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Reyes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Reyes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-06 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brett Condon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Reyes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Nevin Sahni / Caitlin Murphy
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · with Lindsey White championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Reyes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nevin Sahni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Morgan Daley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-16 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kyle Knecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emily Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
84.7%
50W–9L · 63% of games
5.0
69%
20W–9L · 56.8% of games
10.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.8% of games
8.0mixed
100%
15W–0L · 68.1% of games
8.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.7% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
50W–25L · 57.1% of games
9.5mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
139 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
47 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert