Search

Jonathan Malta

HENDERSON, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
80 matches · 49W–31L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
6%
down to 4.0
94%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 4.5
18 of 61

Jonathan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jonathan has been 4.5 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.5202020212026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jonathan has gone from the 57th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.5
67.5%
27W–13L · 55.5% of games
5.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 62.3% of games
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 49.7% of games
9.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
L
Kyle Knecht / Brennan Price
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nevin Sahni
0.037below expectation — took 46% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Mathew Dees / Milo Berger
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Szen
0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 60% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Andre Williams / Beckham Butlerchamps
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · with Brandon StClair
+0.012about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Beckham Butler / Nathan Rosechamps
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with Cruz Colmenares
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cruz Colmenares
+0.051better than expected — took 59% of games against 38% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Paul Wilewski / James Russell
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fernando Dipalma
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Shaun Yokoyama / Nick Arriola
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandon StClair
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fernando Dipalma
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Mike Burgoyne / Mark Sylvain
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandon StClair
+0.026better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christian Kawas
0.158about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Brennan Price / Matt Szen
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Norman
0.011below expectation — took 44% of games against 52% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Orville Ochoa / Manuel Sierra
2026-02-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergio Campos
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.