← Search

Fernando Dipalma

North Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
172 matches · 127W–45L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 4.0
98%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 4.5
12 of 61

Fernando is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Fernando has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Fernando has gone from the 92nd to the 84th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.5
76%
92W–29L · 61% of games
5.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history172 matches
L
Ishmael Gibson / Nathan Rosechamps
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · with Brian Maier
−0.040below expectation — took 32% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Andre Williams / Nolan Dubaychamps
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · with Chris Hubbard
−0.049below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nick Nardiello
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Nick Arriola / Thomas Cunningham
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Mihas
−0.024below expectation — took 63% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Brennan Price / Mike Fitzpatrick
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Costa Felix
−0.040below expectation — took 44% of games against 63% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Paul Wilewski / James Russell
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Malta
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jonathan Malta
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Aaron Shumway / Kevin Barney
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Painter
+0.046better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Attila Tokay
−0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Tobias Janssens / Jean-Francois Blais
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sean Margulis
−0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Christopher Andre / Clinten Butts
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Attila Tokay
+0.020better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Brennan Price / Ary Benoualid
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Costa Felix
−0.030below expectation — took 47% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.