Search

Nick Nardiello

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
148 matches · 97W–51L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.91
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
86%
down to 4.0
14%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 61% down · 39% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.98. Higher than today’s 3.91 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
31 of 39
NV · 4.5
50 of 61

Nick is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Nick has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Nick has gone from the 86th to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.5
73.8%
59W–21L · 59.7% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.5% of games
9.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.8% of games
9.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fernando Dipalma
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Attila Tokay
0.019better than expected — took 100% of games against 90% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Michael Catalano / Mathew Dees
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Norman
+0.035better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Austin Petit / Tom Mullin
2026-03-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Norman
+0.079better than expected — took 72% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-07 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.027about as expected — took 29% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-28 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.095below expectation — took 48% of games against 83% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Fernando Dipalma
+0.021better than expected — took 72% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jean-Francois Blais
0.014about as expected — took 50% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joseph Costa Felix
+0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Tom Gosnell / Daigo Ishikawa
2026-01-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Clinten Butts
+0.055better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-10 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.025below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
N/A
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Mihas
0.119about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.