← Search

Alexander van der Enden

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
132 matches · 87W–45L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.11
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
8%
down to 4.0
92%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.13. Higher than today’s 4.11 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.5
13 of 39
NV · 4.5
22 of 61

Alexander is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Alexander has been a steady 4.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.04.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Alexander has gone from the 83rd to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
100%
14W–0L · 66% of games
4.5
68.1%
49W–23L · 55.4% of games
5.0
75%
3W–1L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 43.2% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 57% of games
9.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
Beckham Butler / Nathan Rose
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Szen
−0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Christopher Painter
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 4.5
−0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 4.5
−0.026about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Tyler Parlade / Tyler Rose
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Szen
+0.073better than expected — took 92% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Joaquin Castruita / Philip Tompkins
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Hammond
+0.026better than expected — took 60% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-28 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.025better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Szen
−0.060below expectation — took 63% of games against 80% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Mathew Dees
2026-03-14 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · #1 Singles · 4.5
−0.027about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brennan Price
+0.024better than expected — took 44% of games against 38% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nevin Sahni
+0.022better than expected — took 92% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Fernando Dipalma / Chris Hubbard
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Szen
+0.064better than expected — took 80% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.