← Search

Tony Cimber

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
208 matches · 102W–106L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.28
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
71 of 139
NV · 3.5
114 of 228

Tony is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tony has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Tony has gone from the 50th to the 77th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
52.4%
86W–78L · 52.8% of games
4.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 42.3% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history208 matches
W
Gary Roeben / Robert Carlson
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with COLE BOREN
+0.046better than expected — took 65% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Colin Haas / Enhua Chen
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoffrey Thompson
+0.011about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Christopher Silversmith / Patrick Phero
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Villani
−0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Nathaniel Bybee / Justin Hseih
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with COLE BOREN
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with KRISTON QUALLS
−0.008about as expected — took 62% of games against 62% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Teddy Ton / Thomas Paszek
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
−0.023below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
Michael Ivy / Allen Song
2026-03-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dennis Wertzler
−0.021below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Neubauer
−0.022about as expected — took 65% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pej Sabet
+0.033better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
AJ Poulin / Jack Stansbery
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with JOHN MacDONALD
+0.026better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Darin McKinney / Kevin O'Hara
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pej Sabet
−0.027below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.