← Search

Adam Neubauer

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 109W–61L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Adam Neubauer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KRISTON QUALLS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brigitte Fallon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Courtney Long mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pej Sabet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie MacDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-28 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Garlan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · RED ROCK CC #1 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Devon Allgower mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Asad Nawaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Villani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.5
70.8%
46W–19L · 56.3% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.8% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
70%
14W–6L · 58.2% of games
7.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Male Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer