← Search

Adam Neubauer

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
170 matches · 109W–61L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.41
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
88%
stay 3.5
12%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 97% stay · 3% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.35. Lower than today’s 3.41 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
42 of 139
NV · 3.5
54 of 228

Adam is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Adam has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Adam has gone from the 72nd to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.1% of games
3.5
72.7%
40W–15L · 57.1% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 46.2% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 50.3% of games
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 57.8% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.8% of games
7.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history170 matches
L
Jeremy James / Blake Kelly
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with KRISTON QUALLS
−0.047below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Alan Mcgrath
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.0
−0.035below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Courtney Long
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brigitte Fallon
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Vittorio Sciarratta / Elijah Dunham
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pej Sabet
−0.008about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Erick Sanchez / Raj Singh
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Cox
−0.012below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie MacDonald
+0.000better than expected — took 92% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jason MacDonald / Taylor Verhaalen
2026-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hogan
+0.048better than expected — took 59% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Prexy Tamayo / James Strassermixed
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Garlan
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Brad Cunningham / Hillary Wolfsonmixed
2026-04-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Devon Allgower
+0.000better than expected — took 38% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
Earl Peralta / Michael Holcomb
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Asad Nawaz
−0.015below expectation — took 38% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
James Mcclary / Ken Kesick
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Villani
+0.030better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.