← Search

William Feast

Incline Village, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
240 matches · 58W–182L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add William Feast to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-04-24 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-13 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-28 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert E Kinsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-27 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-21 · DTC #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert E Kinsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-02-20 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nigel White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-02-13 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
JD de Armond / Alexander Parunin
2026-02-07 · DTC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Royce Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-06 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
28.1%
27W–69L · 42.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–13L · 31.5% of games
7.0
21%
13W–49L · 40.6% of games
7.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 45.3% of games
8.0
11.1%
3W–24L · 32% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
68 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams