Search

William Feast

Incline Village, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
240 matches · 58W–182L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.90
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
90%
down to 3.0
10%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 66% down · 34% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.97. Higher than today’s 2.90 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
NV · 3.5
228 of 228

William is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

William has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, William has gone from the 9th to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.5
28.1%
27W–69L · 42.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–13L · 31.5% of games
7.0
21%
13W–49L · 40.6% of games
7.5
37.9%
11W–18L · 45.3% of games
8.0
11.1%
3W–24L · 32% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history240 matches
L
Mike Little / Daniel Pursel
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
+0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Robert Roig / Darin McKinney
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
+0.006about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Edgar Rizarri / Keith Qualls
2026-04-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Davis
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Gene Lonardo / Alvin Sabas
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
0.013below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Michael Ivy / Allen Song
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert E Kinsey
0.019below expectation — took 20% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Edgar Rizarri / Keith Qualls
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
0.060below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert E Kinsey
+0.037better than expected — took 52% of games against 37% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Edgar Rizarri / Michael Rosenthal
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
0.052below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nigel White
+0.022about as expected — took 35% of games against 31% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Michael Villani / Reynaldo Braganza
2026-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
0.018below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Royce Johnson
+0.025better than expected — took 37% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Robert Roig / Michael Rosenthal
2026-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Mann
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.