Teams

DTC #1

2026 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 55 & OVER · 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-15vs RED ROCK CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Davis / Michael Miller vs Steve Horton / Lenny Badger7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJack Braman / Nigel White vs Jeffrey Gobel / Bernard Osullivan6-2, 6-1
2026-05-08vs NV/Martin/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Miller / Brad Davis vs Wade Richardson / Kent Watts3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Slayter / Michael Garvin vs Steven McCrary / Brook Lee2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNigel White / Robert E Kinsey vs Absalom Alcaraz / Erik Burn3-6, 3-6
2026-05-01vs DTC #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Davis / Michael Garvin vs KRISTON QUALLS / Ted Dela Cruz3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJack Braman / Robert E Kinsey vs George Mulopulos / PEPITO RONQUILLO3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNigel White / Craig Slayter vs KEITH JUNG / Michael Rosenthal4-6, 5-7
2026-04-24vs RED ROCK CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Michael Garvin vs Mike Little / Daniel Pursel2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Robert E Kinsey vs Lenny Badger / Dan Hale3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Nigel White vs Jeffrey Gobel / Bernard Osullivan6-4, 6-3
2026-04-17vs NV/Martin/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Davis / Michael Garvin vs Michael Villani / Scott Paull5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Miller / William Feast vs Robert Roig / Darin McKinney3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJack Braman / Thomas Waite vs Brook Lee / Albert Ferguson1-6, 2-6
2026-04-10vs DTC #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Davis / William Feast vs Edgar Rizarri / Keith Qualls1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Nigel White vs Rod Faircloth / Thomas Schinabeck4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRobert E Kinsey / Michael Garvin vs Gene Lonardo / Charles Jones3-6, 1-6
2026-03-27vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Garvin / Michael Miller vs Lenny Badger / Steve Horton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrad Davis / Nigel White vs Mike Little / Bernard Osullivan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJack Braman / Robert E Kinsey vs Jeffrey Gobel / Daniel Pursel3-6, 4-6
2026-03-20vs NV/Martin/55&Over7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrad Davis / Michael Miller vs Jeremy Christensen / Johnny Underwood1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Garvin / Jack Braman vs Steven McCrary / Wade Richardson1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Slayter / Robert E Kinsey vs Scot Martin / Michael Villani0-6, 3-6
2026-03-13vs DTC #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Feast / Michael Miller vs Gene Lonardo / Alvin Sabas3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Slayter / Nigel White vs Robert Campbell / Sanje Sedera1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN- 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Brad Davis
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.18
Nigel White
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.01
Jack Braman
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.99
William Feast
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Craig Slayter
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.81
Robert E Kinsey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Thomas Waite
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Garvin
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Slayter + Nigel White2844% games+1.2% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Nigel White2637% games−6.2% vs expected
Thomas Waite + William Feast41344% games−6.3% vs expected
Thomas Waite + Craig Slayter41937% games−9.1% vs expected
Jack Braman + Craig Slayter4740% gamesnot enough data
Craig Slayter + William Feast3744% gamesnot enough data
Michael Garvin + Craig Slayter2738% gamesnot enough data
Jack Braman + William Feast0531% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brad Davis
17W–49L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Nigel White
41W–76L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Jack Braman
96W–97L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
William Feast
58W–182L career · 4 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
3.5
Craig Slayter
103W–194L career · 5 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
Robert E Kinsey
5W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Thomas Waite
41W–133L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Michael Garvin
14W–51L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.