Search

Craig Slayter

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
297 matches · 103W–194L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
71%
down to 3.0
29%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 46% down · 54% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Higher than today’s 2.96 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
136 of 139
NV · 3.5
224 of 228

Craig is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Craig has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Craig has gone from the 26th to the 5th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
38%
60W–98L · 47.5% of games
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 44.6% of games
7.0
32.4%
36W–75L · 43.8% of games
8.0
0%
0W–5L · 10.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history297 matches
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Garvin
+0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 23% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
KEITH JUNG / Michael Rosenthal
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nigel White
+0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Jeffrey Gobel / Bernard Osullivan
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nigel White
+0.031better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Scot Martin / Michael Villani
2026-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert E Kinsey
+0.001below expectation — took 20% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Robert Campbell / Sanje Sedera
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nigel White
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Dan Hale / David Ponte
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gene Lonardo
0.001about as expected — took 42% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
KRISTON QUALLS / Ephraim Garcia
2026-02-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Waite
+0.004below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Earl Peralta / Michael Holcomb
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wade Richardson
0.039below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Jabo Tang / Abdiel Yamomo
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nigel White
+0.024better than expected — took 48% of games against 38% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wade Richardson
+0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Alfredo Sabillo / George Mulopulos
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Waite
0.016below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
KRISTON QUALLS / Stephen Newell
2026-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Miller
0.005below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.