← Search

Jeffrey Gobel

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
213 matches · 113W–100L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Gobel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history213 matches
W
2026-09-06 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kim Springer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Stowe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Nathalia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Nathalia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Palichat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-15 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernard Osullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-10 · SPANISH TRAIL · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Palichat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-01 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Horton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-25 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Leavitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernard Osullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · CLUB RIDGES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
81.1%
30W–7L · 64% of games
3.5
43.1%
31W–41L · 49% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.8% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.6% of games
6.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 55.5% of games
6.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 45.5% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
15W–21L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
7 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe