Search

Bill Bosnos

Las Vegas, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
160 matches · 74W–86L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 35 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 3.5
59 of 139
NV · 3.5
91 of 228

Bill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bill has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Bill has gone from the 49th to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 57.8% of games
3.5
46.8%
29W–33L · 47.6% of games
4.0
37.5%
12W–20L · 43.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 32.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history160 matches
L
Nick Strobelt / David Leibner
2026-07-28 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Michalski
0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Nabil Nassri / Hugo Olivares-Ponce
2026-07-16 · #1 Male Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Stritt
0.028below expectation — took 60% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Aleksei Zilberman / T Paul Williams
2026-07-14 · #1 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Kott
0.027below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · #2 Male Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Kott
+0.040better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Wade Richardson / Blake Kelly
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Austin
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.027below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Shane Littlefield / Tracey Leemixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Bosnos
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Harrison Fried / Ran Torrenueva
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Jaeger
+0.067better than expected — took 100% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
William Lucas / Chris Roth
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Berg
0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Tyler Gaston / Katelyn Glennmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Bosnos
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
JOHN MacDONALD / Chris Chapman
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Gilmore
+0.032better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Jeff Ng / Anthony Ng
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Mcclary
+0.009below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.