Search

Jordan Bosnos

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
294 matches · 172W–122L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.60
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
10%
down to 3.5
90%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.60 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Las Vegas · 4.0
92 of 129
NV · 4.0
136 of 203

Jordan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jordan has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 2 moves up and 0 down.

2.53.03.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jordan has gone from the 38th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
2.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 63.6% of games
3.0
79.5%
31W–8L · 65.1% of games
3.5
67.6%
46W–22L · 59% of games
4.0
53.6%
67W–58L · 52% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 39.4% of games
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 62.5% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 43% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 34.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history294 matches
L
Shane Littlefield / Tracey Leemixed
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Bosnos
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonna Gilmore
0.030below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Brynn Roberts / Samantha Schwartz
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Blum
+0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Esther Tan / Janet Wellman
2026-05-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonna Gilmore
+0.052better than expected — took 92% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Tyler Gaston / Katelyn Glennmixed
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Bosnos
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonna Gilmore
+0.044better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Charlene Rath / Elizabeth Hansen
2026-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Alred
0.027below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josephine McPeak
+0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aleksei Zilberman
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annie Guiliano
+0.013about as expected — took 37% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-23 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonna Gilmore
+0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bill Bosnos
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.